#ciekawostki #ufo #obcy #teoriespiskowe

Naukowcy z Uniwersytetu Harvarda i Instytutu Technologicznego w Montanie spekulują, że niezidentyfikowana, zaawansowana technologicznie populacja pozaziemskich istot może potajemnie żyć wśród ludzi na Ziemi.


Tak. To na serio, podnieś tę szczękę z ziemi i się tak nie gap.

W tłumaczeniu. Naukowcy z Harvardu zastanawiają się nad tym co foliowe czapeczki mówią od dawna.

Zdjęcie

Materiał z wiadomości na ten temat:

-----------------------------------------------------------

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is6OhX-BxYw

-----------------------------------------------------------

To skoro już jesteśmy w tym miejscu. Załóż jeszcze trochę więcej folii na głowę. To o czym spiskowcy mówią ale jeszcze mądrość etapu nie odkryła.

- obcy (kosmici) są tu od tysięcy lat

- gatunek ludzki jest gatunkiem hybrydowym między przybyszami a wczesnymi inteligentnymi istotami ziemskimi (homo erectus)

- wszystkie religie powstały pod wpływem interwencji obcych ( anioły z Biblii / Koranu / Tory, bogowie plemion którzy przybyli z nieba ect.)

- jest ich kilka grup, traktują ziemię jak ZOO i mają wspólną politykę nie ujawniania się (największym sukcesem diabła jest wmówienie ludziom że nie istnieje) są wyjątki które się wyłamują

- obcy potrafią się wmieszać między ludzi (przy zaawansowanej inżynierii genetycznej praktycznie nie do odróżnienia od zwykłych ludzi)

- mają wpływ na politykę / zajmują stanowiska władzy / tworzą prawo (zjawisko występuje na całym globie)

- mają wpływ pośredni i bezpośredni na polityków i pożytecznych szabasgojów

- obcy mają negatywny stosunek (z rożnym spektrom szarości) do ludzi jako grupy dominującej na tej planecie

- dążą do degeneracji / zahamowania rozwoju (mentalnego i technologicznego) ludzi i powstrzymania ich przed szerszą eksploracją przestrzeni pozaziemskiej (traktują jako potencjalną konkurencje którą trzyma się przy ziemi)

- obecnie jesteśmy na etapie oswajania z myślą o obcych (zbyt wielu ludzi wie i już nie tak łato ich zlikwidować) nie będzie głośnego lądowania przed Białym Domem (tam sami swoi) tylko płynna tranzycja informacji w kierunku "nie jesteśmy tu sami no i?" (ignorancja to najpotężniejsza broń)

To wszystkie ważniejsze punkty teorii spiskowych które na razie przychodzą mi do głowy. Jako koneser środowisk spiskowych, jak coś jeszcze sobie przypomnę kluczowego to dopiszę.

Wstawiam to tylko po to by potem czytelnicy nie mieli zdziwionka "Ale jak to tak?". O tym było mówione / ostrzegane od dawna a potem pakowane przez sceptyków do szufladki "teorie spiskowe" i "szury". Punkty z czasem będą po prostu coraz bardziej wyraźne.

8

@Andrzej_Zielinski,

W ciągu kilku pierwszych minut materiału pada informacja, że jest to bardziej eksperyment myślowy i że nikt nie ma żadnych twardych dowodów. Nie jestem jakimś ekspertem w tym temacie ale gdyby żyli pośród nas to czemu po prostu nie zostaliby politykami zamiast tego wywierać na nich nacisk/wpływ?
@kamien_pastewny, Nie twierdzę, że to nie możliwe. Są politycy tak oderwani od ziemi, że nie da się ich przypisać do ludzi.

Ale tu jest też problem. Polityk jest jak gorący ziemniak, lepiej go mieć ale nie za blisko. Faktyczna władza polityka też jest mocno ograniczona a co gorsza wszystkie kamery są skierowane na niego.

Jak obejść ten problem?

Sterować politykiem zza kurtyny. Były agent CIA Andrew Bustamante opisuje to tak. Jeżeli organizacja chce wpłynąć na polityka raczej nie celuje bezpośrednio w niego, jest to zwyczajnie zbyt ryzykowne. Jednak mniej czy bardziej anonimowe osoby stanowisko niżej, doradcy osoby mające władzę sprawczą do których docierają istotne informacje które są potem przekazywane w formie już przetrawionej do polityka, te osoby budzą zainteresowanie służb.

Domniemuję, że podobny tok myślenia występuje też u obcych którzy chcą mieć wpływ na świat i ludzi.

@Andrzej_Zielinski,

To może od początku. Zakładając, że człowiek ewoluował od organizmów jedno komórkowych na przestrzeni milionów lat, biorąc również pod uwagę, że musiały zaistnieć tak bardzo specyficzne warunki to, mimo nieskończoności wszechświata, wydaje mi się, że powstanie innej cywilizacji jest bardzo mało prawdopodobne. Dokładając do tego technologię pozwalającą na podróże między gwiezdne/galaktyczne czy wymiarowe to jednak jestem sceptycznie nastawiony do samego istnienia gdziekolwiek innej cywilizacji.

Uważam też, że ludzka głupota i chciwość są nieskończone i nie potrzebujemy wcale obcych żeby się samemu unicestwić. Dlatego dyskusja na temat wpływania obcych na polityków czy ich otoczenia wydaje mi się, przynajmniej obecnie, co najmniej abstrakcyjna. Nie mniej szanuje i rozumiem, że ktoś może uważać inaczej
@kamien_pastewny, Wiek wszechświata 13,82 miliarda lat, niektóre badania wskazują na znacznie starszy. Nasze słońce jest 3 generacją gwiazd, stworzoną z pyłu wyrzuconego przez poprzednie umierające gwiazdy.

Ziemia uformowała się 4,54 mld lat temu. Pierwsze życie na ziemi pojawiło się (z naciskiem na 'pojawiło' bo nie można wykluczyć panspermii) 4,28 mld lat temu. Pierwsi człowikowaći używający narzędzi wg. oficjalnej nauki pojawili się 2,6 miliona lat temu. Widoczny postęp technologiczny pojawił się 1000 - 1500 lat temu. Eksplozja industrialna trwa od zaledwie 200 lat. Pierwszy samolot braci Wright wystartował w 1903r. czyli trochę ponad 100 lat temu. Pierwszy człowiek na księżycu (przynajmniej oficjalnie) stanął tam w 1969r.

------------------------------------------------------

Obecny obraz ludzkości jaki znamy jest promilem, promila na skali czasowej wszechświata. Jest absolutnie nie możliwe aby w tym czasie nie powstały inne inteligentne formy życia które mogą być od nas wielokrotnie starsze i wielokrotnie bardziej zaawansowane cywilizacyjnie.

"Nie istnienie" obcych w kosmosie jest matematycznie niemożliwe. I to bez poruszania kwestii wymiarów równoległych i bardziej obskurnych hipotez.

Nie jestesmy sami i nigdy nie byliśmy.
@Andrzej_Zielinski,

O i taka dyskusja ma sens bo można się czegoś dowiedzieć. Nie mniej jednak dowodów na istnienie obcych cywilizacji brak więc jak dla mnie to jesteśmy jednak sami.

To że powstało życie na naszej planecie to turbo zbieg różnego rodzaju okoliczności. To, że wciąż nasza cywilizacja istnieje - podobnie. To, że istnieje inna cywilizacja pewnie jest możliwe. Natomiast to, że dysponuje ona technologią pozwalającą jej do nas dotrzeć (i że jest nami zainteresowana) oraz, że jest podobna do nas (w końcu ukrywa się między nami w naszej atmosferze) to już bardziej brzmi jak science fiction.

Jeżeli jednak tak jest to i tak nie mam na to wpływu ani dostępu do takich informacji. Dlatego też sama świadomość czy jest tak czy inaczej z grubsza jest mi obojętna bo i tak nic z tym nie mogę zrobić.
@Andrzej_Zielinski, Teorie spiskowe to świetne hobby, zawsze jest jakiś dreszczyk niepewności czy czasem to nie prawda zwłaszcza jak czasem niektóre elementy pasują do ogólnej układanki - np. o 3 wojnie światowej było wiadome jeszcze przed 1 i 2 wojną światową i że 3 wojna światowa ma inny cel - zjednoczyć ludzkość pod rządami antychrysta.

Btw zobacz sobie remove viewing - kolega szur poziomu 33 mi dał

http://www.reddit.com/r/AstralProjection/comments/n840wp/armycia_remote_viewer_joe_mcmoneagle_talks_about/
@kusanagi, Dzięki. Ten link z reddita do filmu już nie istnieje. Ale zapisałem sobie nazwisko Joe McMoneagle i po tym będę szukał.

Taki ciekawy wywiad przypadkiem znalazłem po drodze. Z 1987r. z Johnem Learem pilotem CIA, kandydatem na senatora, i koneserem wiedzy o UFO.

----------------------------------------------------

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItRiw2HwvF0

----------------------------------------------------
@Andrzej_Zielinski, Poniżej robiłem sobie test z ai whisper i taki transkrypt mam

Ladies and gentlemen, our next presentation,

our next speaker is Joe McMonagall.

Now the simple truth is that for this audience,

I don't think that Joe McMonagall, the remote viewer,

needs much of an introduction.

So I just want to say a small little bit about Joe McMonagall,

the man.

I personally only got to meet Joe just this week.

I never had the pleasure to meet him before.

And upon getting to meet this most wondrous person,

my overwhelming feeling was, wow, wow,

this is like the grandpa that I never had,

like the all-knowing, all-loving, all-trusting man

whose feet that I would like to sit at and whose sage advice

I would like to have benefit of to guide me through my life.

I say this with all lovingness in my heart, OK,

because I'm probably old enough to be Joe's father.

But that being said, this feeling

is overwhelming upon meeting Joe the man.

And the next two hours, gosh, all of us

are going to get to sit down with Joe,

and we are going to get to be privileged to just get

a little bit of his knowledge and his guidance and his love

and some truth to help us make our way through the maze.

Ladies and gentlemen, Joe McMonagall.

Thanks.

Well, I don't know.

I can't tell how many people are out there, four or five,

I guess.

I'm here to talk about UFOs and aliens.

I'm here to talk about UFOs and aliens.

You can turn on the presentation now, I suppose.

Oh, there it is.

For those of you who, the four or five in the crowd

that don't know me, I'm Joe McMonagall.

I'm a remote viewer, remote viewer 001.

What that means is that I was part of a top secret organization

that was disclosed in November of 1995 on Nightline.

The United States Army actually started the organization

in 1978, October of 1978, actually.

I spent 19 and a half years in that organization.

I was the first remote viewer that was recruited.

And the last one out the door, I turned out the lights.

In 1984, when I retired from the Army,

I was hired by the lab that was located at SRI International.

So I was the only remote viewer out of the Army unit

that was moved to the lab and worked in the lab as a remote

viewer.

That way, they could continue to use me as a collection person,

as well as use me for scientific research purposes.

I moved with the lab when it closed at SRI International

to the laboratory at the Science Applications International

Corporation, where we continued to operate for the government

until it formally closed in November of 1995.

The project closed.

When the lab closed at SAIC, the lab didn't actually close.

It moved to the Laboratory for Fundamental Research

in Palo Alto, where it continues to do research.

I'm now a research associate at Palo Alto.

We've continued to do research in remote viewing.

So I'm still a research associate there.

Also in 1984, when I retired from the military,

I started my own company called Intuitive Intelligence

Applications and started doing remote viewing for corporate

entities in America.

I never talk about my corporate clients

because I guarantee total anonymity.

On my website, which is jmceagle.com, I advertise that fact.

If I do work for corporate clients, investigative clients,

FBI, that sort of thing, or detective agencies,

or police departments, or individuals,

I never talk about that work because if I do,

then I lose them as clients.

So I have corporate clients that now go back to 1984.

And I've done literally thousands of remote viewings

privately.

One of the things I want to underscore

is the fact that about 85% of my remote viewing

I don't get paid for because a vast majority of my remote

viewing is done on missing people, missing children, bodies,

criminal cases, the kinds of remote viewing

that most people can't afford to pay for.

I do remote viewing for people that have been unfortunately

jailed or incarcerated for crimes

that they probably didn't commit or at least

claim they didn't commit.

Anyway, I've written four books on remote viewing.

I wasn't only going to say that, but Bob asked me to hold them up

and explain in very brief what they all contain.

The first book, MindTrek, this is actually not the first cover.

The first cover was blue.

I actually wrote MindTrek.

The first book MindTrek and the blue cover came out in 1993.

It did not mention the government project

because the government project was still

top secret and compartmented.

When the first book came out in 1993,

I published it deliberately against caution

because I felt the world needed to know about remote viewing.

So I wrote it and did not mention the government top secret

project, but I did mention remote viewing in great detail.

I wanted the world to know about remote viewing

because I felt it was important.

In 1997, I re-edited the book and added two chapters talking

about the top secret project because by then it had been

exposed.

In 1999, I came out with a book, Ultimate Time Machine,

where I talked about the illusion of time space

because in my mind, it is an illusion.

I made a lot of predictions in that book

in the second half of the book, approximately 165 predictions

for the next 75 years.

What's kind of interesting about those predictions

is about 50 of them have come true already.

They weren't supposed to come true for 75 years,

but they're accelerating.

And I suspect what's happening is people

are reading that book and taking my predictions

and going out and inventing them.

Recently, as an example, Boeing has

announced the design of a helicopter, which

goes into fixed wing after it's lifted off.

And they're predicting it will attain supersonic flight.

That's an example.

I didn't predict that would happen for probably 25 years.

Another interesting example are aircraft carrier size ships

that will be selling condominiums

and drifting around the world.

There's now seven of those on the high seas.

And one is being constructed by a Japanese and Australian firm.

And that's going to be about the size of four aircraft carriers

with two landing decks on its roof for allure size jets.

My third book, Remote Viewing Secrets,

I wrote with the intention of providing people

as a handbook for remote viewing.

The reason I did this is because I don't train remote viewing.

I'm probably the only person out of the project that doesn't.

The reason I don't train remote viewing

is for the simple reason that I know

from working in the lab for many, many years

that every human being that walks the planet is psychic.

And all you have to be to be a remote viewer is psychic.

And every human being that ever walked in our lab

has been able to do remote viewing from the get go.

All you have to do is be subjected to the remote viewing

protocol.

So all you need to do to do remote viewing

is learn the protocols.

So if you buy my book, Remote Viewing Secrets,

you can learn the protocols.

That should save a lot of money, that in practice.

The real secret to remote viewing

is learning to let go of the ego.

Now, that does take practice.

I've been doing remote viewing for 27 years,

and I'm still practicing letting go of the ego.

It's a hard thing to do.

My last book, Stargate Chronicles, is an autobiography.

There seems to be a rumor, I don't know how it got started,

that because of the project, in 19 and 1 half years

of remote viewing in the government,

for every intelligence agency the government has to include

the Coast Guard, there seems to be a rumor

that the government somehow supported remote viewing.

That's wrong.

The government never did.

They used it, they loved it, they tasked it,

and they beat a lot of people up over it.

But every day that we remote viewed

was like a knife fight in a phone booth.

It cost a lot of lives, and a lot of people got hurt,

and it destroyed a lot of careers.

And I wanted to write about it and talk about just

how tough it was on a lot of people.

There were some people that spent four years

remote viewing and never had a day off.

There was one man who was 29 years old

when he had his massive coronary and died.

He was married and had a child on the way.

And his name is never mentioned in anybody's book,

in any event.

Moving on.

I'm also the only remote viewer who's

a full member of the Parapsychological Association.

That's by invite only, and it's a gift

as a result of my capacity as a scientist.

That's due to my research over the years in remote viewing.

I've demonstrated remote viewing 43 times

on national level television in six countries.

That's an accomplishment that's been pretty difficult.

What that means is that those 43 times were run by national level

television companies, and they were all double blinds.

They were done in studios under bright lights,

with lots of crazy people running around trying

to make things work.

The most difficult of those were appearances

on six television shows in Japan.

What I like about the Japanese appearances

are they were truly double blinds in that they

involved finding missing people.

As an example, in the Japanese appearances,

it involved 11 missing people.

And we're talking people, in this case,

that were missing anywhere from 17 to 35 years.

When I talk about double blind in all 11 people missing cases,

the names were written in Japanese

and placed in double wrapped opaque seal envelopes

and presented to me by the production crews.

There were coded numbers written on the outside, usually

the date of the day I did the remote viewing.

I was asked to describe the individuals first

so that that would confirm whether or not

I was working the right person.

So if the person inside the envelope

was a 67-year-old woman, then I had to describe a 67-year-old

woman.

If I describe a 12-year-old male, obviously I was wrong

and they would discontinue the filming.

In the case of the 11 people, I was

able to locate seven of them physically in Japan

from my dining room in Virginia.

By drawing sufficiently detailed pictures

that they could locate and identify the specific city

in Japan, then lead a team and a film crew, a team of detectives

and a film crew, to the specific city in Japan,

follow a drawn street map in the city

to a specific neighborhood.

You all know what the neighborhoods in Japan look like.

Then locate a specific house that

matched the sketch for the house I drew in my dining room

in Virginia.

And then locate the name on the mailbox in the house

or the apartment that matched the birth date and the name

of the person in the envelope.

And then reunite that person with the actual daughter,

brother, sister, or husband of the person looking for them.

In some cases, it was looking for the name of the birth

mother of an adopted woman who was adopted

when they were an infant.

The four individuals that I was not

able to find involved the person who

was identified as kidnapped by the North Koreans,

later confirmed, very difficult to find that person.

A person who I later was able to identify as turned to ash

because they were dead, they had been cremated,

I was able to locate their ashes in South Korea,

Busan, South Korea, and the other half of their ashes

in Tokyo in two different cemeteries.

And the other two people they're currently looking for

were two kidnapped children.

One was kidnapped 11 years ago and the other was kidnapped

seven years ago, both from train stations.

The police are investigating both of those crimes,

so they won't broadcast those on television.

Out of the 43 examples on national television,

38 of them have been successful.

One of the other things I wanted to say about the demonstrations

on national-level television, one of my most recent,

which is currently being shown as we speak on French television,

it was actually set up to be run on national-level television

in France by the top skeptic of one

of the local skeptical groups in France.

He's sort of like the amazing Randy in France.

He's the head of a magicians group there.

And I agreed to do it because he agreed to run it straight up

with a double-blind scenario where they would do an outbounder

protocol where they would randomly select two places in Paris

and then travel to those locations while I would describe

where they were going from my dining room in Virginia.

They would film me simultaneously with their traveling

to those locations in Paris.

The second part of the agreement would

be that Mario Varvogluis, who was the president of the Parapsychological

Association, would accompany him,

and kind of look over his shoulder to keep him straight.

So there'd be no funny business.

In actuality, what happened is one of the random targets

they pulled was the guard Nord, which

is a very famous bridge in downtown Paris.

It's a very ornate bridge with arches,

and it has a series of statues on it.

There are these sort of cherubic angels holding up torches.

And I describe them standing in the center of the bridge looking

up at these cherubic statues holding torches.

At the precise time that they were filming this,

they had two cameras locked together by satellite clocks.

And the clocks are running in the upper right corner

of the pictures in time sequence.

And as I was drawing the cherubic statue holding the torches,

they were standing in front of one looking up at it.

And I said that it was a bridge with ornate work done

in the side in the bronze, which it had.

It worked so well that the skeptic in France

brought suit to prevent it being shown in France.

So while he was busy in court to prevent it

being shown on the particular channel they

were going to show it on in France,

they were busy editing it to show it on a famous cable show

in France.

So as we speak, it's being shown on that particular cable show.

He lost.

The general description of remote viewing

is the capacity to describe a person, place, or location

in great detail to which you have no access to, generally,

other than through mental means.

And that it can't be shielded.

It can't be blocked.

And that means by distance, time.

In other words, there's no way you

can prevent a remote viewer from gaining access to it.

We now know after many, many years, almost three decades

of deliberately trying to shield remote viewers

that you can't shield a remote viewer from anything.

There are a lot of people out there

that will tell you you can be shielded.

You can prevent a remote viewer from getting to things,

but you can't.

I'm here to tell you you can't.

We've tried everything.

Remote viewers have been put in submarines

and taken down a mile and a half into the ocean depths

where neutrinos cannot penetrate.

They still do just as well.

They've been put in positively shielded cages, negatively

shielded cages.

They do just as well.

Remote viewers have targeted the outlying planets

years before flybys by collection satellites.

And they've done statistically better on those targets

than they've done on earthbound targets.

In fact, Ingo Swan, one of the premier psychics

and remote viewers at SRI International,

produced some amazing paintings of outlying planets

long before the collection flyby satellites took their photos.

And those paintings showed that anomalies

on those planets long before the satellites collected

the pictures to confirm them.

In other words, his remote viewing

was more accurate than all of the astronomers were prior

to the collection satellites proving his remote viewing.

So remote viewing can be very, very accurate.

Unfortunately, there's a lot of times when it's not.

So one of the ways we deal with that

is we do correctional remote viewing

before and after normal remote viewing.

So when you're targeting something

that you don't know a lot about, you

try to do other remote viewing to bracket it.

That's one way.

The other way is you use remote viewers that are absolutely

confirmed as being very, very good.

You don't use beginning remote viewers.

You don't use remote viewers you can't trust.

Or you don't use remote viewers you

don't have a lot of confidence in yet.

What's the differences between being psychic

and being a remote viewer?

That's a pretty good question.

A lot of people have that in their minds.

Immediately after the exposure of the program on Nightline,

nobody knew what remote viewing was.

I mean, it was some talk about it.

But nobody would claim to be a remote viewer

because nobody really understood that.

Boy, but as soon as everybody heard about the top secret

military project remote viewing, my god,

everybody that was psychic suddenly became a remote viewer.

It was amazing.

Because being a remote viewer had some veracity to it.

The government did it.

Well, actually, there's no difference at all.

In reality, there's absolutely no difference at all,

except being a remote viewer is being psychic

under a very, very strict control.

And it's very strict.

I mean, strict like you dream about.

You're not allowed to be psychic the way you like to be.

You want to be psychic the way you like to be, that's OK.

Go be psychic.

But don't call it remote viewing.

That's not allowed.

You want to be a remote viewer, you

have to reign the way you like to be psychic in,

and you've got to do it within the rules of being a remote viewer.

And the way you do that is following a protocol.

And the protocol for being a remote viewer is very, very strict.

The original protocol started out very early on.

It started out way back in the very early 1970s, around 1972,

with the original CIA interest.

They hired SRI to check it out.

And SRI labeled something they didn't understand, remote viewing,

because they didn't have a good word for it.

They didn't want to alarm everybody with what's

this thing we're calling psychic something or other.

They said that raises a lot of very ugly emotions.

So we're going to call it remote seeing or remote viewing.

So they came up with this term, remote viewing.

That didn't raise a lot of hackles in the government area.

So they call it remote viewing, but it was a protocol they wrote.

And they call it the outbounder protocol.

And the way it basically worked was kind of interesting.

What they would do is they'd randomly select an area.

They actually had a bunch of areas.

They had maybe 100 in the San Francisco Bay Area.

And this 100 areas were very specific places

that were standalone.

They were way out of the way places.

They were very like a restaurant sitting out

on the edge of the Bay Area, or it was a very unique looking

building that sat alone in the middle of a park.

Or it was like the art museum at Stanford University.

It was a building that was unique or a place that

was unique, like this restaurant, for instance,

had a boat sitting on the roof.

I mean, that's bizarre, right?

But they were really unique.

One place was so different from the next that it was unique.

And they photographed this place.

They wrote the address down.

And they put it in a seal envelope, a big brown envelope.

And they wrote numbers on them.

And they stacked them all up and put them in a safe.

And the numbers equated to just a six digit random number.

They put them in a safe.

They put them in a different building even

so nobody could cheat, because they assumed

that people would cheat.

That's how careful scientists are.

And the way the outbounder thing worked

is at 9 o'clock in the morning, a remote viewer

and a monitor who knew nothing about what

their target would be would go into a windowless room

on the third floor.

And they'd locked themselves in with the agreed upon idea

that at 9 30, it would be their target time.

At 9 o'clock also, a third person, the outbounder,

would go into another room and take a random number generator

and generate a number.

And he'd take that number and write it

on a piece of paper or a three by five card.

And he'd walk across the compound to the other office

where that safe was.

And he'd give that number to the clerk.

And the clerk would go to the safe

and pull that brown file and give it to him.

And he'd walk from that building to his car and get in it.

And he'd drive off.

And at 9 15, he'd stop wherever he was in traffic

and he'd open the envelope.

And he'd pull out the address.

And he'd drive to that address and get out of his car.

So at 9 30, he'd be wherever that address was.

And let's say it was a restaurant with that boat on the roof.

And he'd go in that restaurant and order a meal.

So he'd be sitting in that restaurant for 30 minutes

eating breakfast.

And meanwhile, at 9 30 in the windowless room,

the monitor and the remote viewer would turn on a camera

and a recorder and they'd say, OK, Joe,

describe where our outbounder is.

And he'd whip the picture of the outbounder on me.

Describe where this guy is.

And I'd have to figure out where this guy was.

Now, I might draw a picture of that restaurant.

What do you think the odds are I'd put a boat on the roof?

It was bizarre back then.

You had to be there, I guess.

That was the outbounder protocol.

The outbounder protocol had a lot wrong with it.

What do you think was wrong with it?

The problem was you want to be inside KGB headquarters.

Who's going to volunteer to walk in?

Man, that's terrible.

So they came up with a couple modifications

to the outbounder protocol.

They said, we need something better for targeting.

And Ingo came up with this idea, well, you just

need a better address than a person.

We'll use coordinates.

Get coordinates down to the second.

50 degrees, 22 minutes, 35 seconds north, et cetera.

Down to the seconds, like 50 by 50, or 900 by 900 meters

or something.

So you get pretty close.

Well, that sounded pretty good to everybody.

That gets you to a building.

And then you write a question down.

You put it in the envelope with the coordinates on it.

And we tried that.

And that worked really well.

That worked as good as an outbounder.

We started nailing buildings and rooms and buildings.

Describe room 222 and this coordinate, this building

coordinate, and we'd get descriptions of that room.

That worked really well.

But the CIA didn't like it.

And the reason they didn't like it is, obviously,

Joe has an idetic memory.

You know what an idetic memory is?

That means that I subconsciously have memorized

the entire planet.

I probably did.

I got burned once by a UFO.

So I probably got the whole planet burned into my brain

at the same time.

So my suggestion was, OK, then put the damn coordinates

in a second envelope.

And let me just target the blank envelope.

And that worked as well.

So we started doing blank envelopes.

And then they didn't understand that concept.

Well, how can you get a target in a blank envelope?

Somebody's cheating.

Well, OK, then let's get rid of the monitor.

That worked.

Then somebody's telling them the answer.

Well, OK, then you sit behind a one-way glass and watch.

OK, then we don't want you to know what the question is.

Well, OK, then you come think it.

Well, that worked.

What really made them nervous, I think basically really made

them nervous is when they got more for their answer

than they wanted.

So here's an example of a really poor.

I want to show you some examples of remote viewing.

So you get an idea between poor, moderately good, and really

good.

So you get a concept for real remote viewing so that when I

talk about alien kind of remote viewing, you get an idea

for what's going on.

This is a really poor remote viewing.

This is a remote viewing that was done in January of 2003.

This is pretty poor.

I'm going to put up the data so you can see it.

Open gray, that's AOL break, analytic overlay break.

Break, white gray, dirty white gray, break, open.

It took about 30 minutes to do that.

Not a lot of data there.

Obviously, the remote viewer has got something, a lot of

white, a lot of gray, and a lot of dirt.

Kind of interesting.

What do you think it is?

A lot of dirt, a lot of white, a lot of gray, right?

Pretty good target.

Now, the obvious things wrong with this target are, I can

tell you, a whole bunch wrong with this target.

This is a training target.

It seems to be a good target to pick at the outset because

it's got a lot of really cool, neat things about it visually.

The problem with it is there's no time.

And time is really important in this target because it took

about 20 nanoseconds for it to go off.

The second thing wrong about the target is with a beginning

viewer, viewers have a tendency to avoid violent targets or

emotionally impacting targets in the beginning.

There's a tendency for human beings to avoid nasty things.

I don't know why.

We military remote viewers would go, ah, big bomb.

That would have been the first line, big bomb, so what?

And the other problem with this is there really isn't much

happening in reality.

As an entropy of interest, one of the things that drives

remote viewing, by the way, is entropy at the target.

That means immediate change.

There's not a lot of entropy here, believe it or not.

There's a sudden change of no consequence.

So that's a pretty poor target to begin with, which is

why there's not a lot of data.

Here's another interesting target.

You've got a lot of raised walkways and lower walkways.

You've got possibly an elevator in the center that's

glassed in.

You've got flower beds and maybe a pool, an open atrium that's

somewhat enclosed.

Took about 60 minutes to do this drawing.

Really had to work at it.

This is a moderately good target.

This was a sealed envelope containing a photograph.

That was the target.

The target was actually a photograph and a sealed envelope.

Took about 60 minutes.

So this was a pretty good target, actually.

This is a good training target.

That's the actual target itself.

This has a lot more going on for it.

Now, obviously, there's still a lot wrong with the target

because it's a hole in the ground.

But nevertheless, there's a lot there.

If you had to find this target in a city, you'd be more apt

to locate it using the data from a remote viewer.

There's a lot of similarities to the drawing.

That would rate pretty moderately in a normal remote

viewing evaluation, but there's still wrong data.

There's no pool.

And there's the planning beds and stuff.

I mean, there's not a lot of wrong data there.

Now, I'm going to show you some of my viewing, which is I'm

going to give the setup for it, which is kind of interesting.

We had an agency come to us.

They had never used this before.

I actually had to get clearance to use this information

because it was classified up until just before the closure

of the project.

The particular agency that came to us had never used this

before.

And they said they wanted to, but they didn't

trust remote viewing.

And we said, why not?

And they said, because you control everything.

And we said, OK, you control everything then.

And you task us.

And we showed them how to do it.

And they came to us and said, OK, we're going to task you.

Can you basically track an agent in the field?

And we said, sure, no problem.

They said, what do you need is targeting information.

We said, we just need something that identifies the agent.

So they said, how about a social security number?

We said, sure, piece of cake.

So they gave us a social security number for the agent.

That was the target.

And they said, over the course of the next two years,

we will just tap you on the shoulder and say,

tell us where the agent is.

And it suddenly got harder.

We said, OK.

And so we had the social security number on a three by five

card.

And I carried that around on my wallet, folded over my wallet.

And one day at about four in the afternoon,

they called up my monitor.

There's a Dr. Nevin Lance.

He's a psychologist in San Francisco.

And they called him on the phone and said, you're tapped.

And he called me on the phone.

And I met him at his home.

And he said, tell me where the agent is on the social security

number in your wallet.

And I drew this picture.

That's the only picture I drew.

And I said, the agent's in a T-shaped building.

And I'll call it a building.

It's an administration building.

And I said, off to the right is a lab complex.

And it's inside double-fenced wire.

And there's a tree line road off the one side and a big

parking lot next to it.

And there's a city off to the side.

And up in the corner, up in the corner, up here in the

corner, I drew a little thing up there in the corner.

And I said, that's a primary intersection.

That's the way it goes in and out.

It turns out that that's a main gate entry.

And it turns out that this is Lawrence, Livermore, West

Gate.

And the T-shaped building is actually the administration

building, and it's called Building A. And in my

statements on the tape, I said that he was on the seventh

floor, which is the primary administrator's office.

And he was actually standing in the guy's office, sitting in

front of his desk.

And anybody that sees the drawing immediately says, oh,

that's Lawrence Livermore's West Gate, and that's the

administration building, which is kind of fun.

That's a top secret bomb-making facility, by the way.

It was about four months later.

They tapped me on the shoulder again, and I got out the

Social Security card.

It took me about an hour and a half to draw that previous

drawing, too, by the way.

This time, I drew some hills, and I put in some poles.

I drew little dotted lines, interconnecting them.

And I said, it's some kind of a power grid.

And I said, there's little halos around the poles.

I don't know if you can see the halos or not.

There's little halos around the poles.

And I said, it's moving some kind of electrical power

stuff around between it.

And I said, that's all there is.

It took eight and a half minutes to draw the drawing.

That's it.

That's all you got, and that's all there was.

And he was sitting in his car on that road when I drew the

drawing.

So about a year went by, and they called up, and they said,

you did pretty good locating our agent.

Now we'd like you to tell us what he's doing.

And I said, well, he's in the middle of a desert, and he's

working on something that broadcasts energy.

And for this particular target, I produced 44 pages of data

in a whole lot of drawings, and they wouldn't release the

data, and they'd only release a couple pages of drawings.

So I'll share the pages of drawings that they released.

Basically, I said there's a field of projection that

comes out.

And these little X's were electronic equipment that

they would set out in the field.

And this thing was a generator that projected out into that

field, and it was doing destructive transmissions on

this electronic stuff.

And this whole unit was inside a big trailer, a shock-mounted

trailer of some kind.

And that was the output, the gun part of the output.

And that was the wave production part of the output.

And that was the wave guide part of the output.

What's interesting here is that I made this feat, and it's

actually inches, centimeters, and it's actually inches.

The measurements are correct.

It should have been inches instead of that.

That's the output part in the trailer.

That's what it actually looks like.

And it was sitting in the Sandia Desert, by the way.

One of the other interesting parts of this, as I said,

your spy also has a hobby.

They said, our spy does not have hobbies.

I said, oh, but your spy does.

On his lunch hour, he goes over to this other place, and he

looks at these things.

It's a very huge facility.

It's about the size of a football field, and it has a big

tower on one end.

And it has mirrors, a lot of mirrors, and they're all

computer-controlled and linked together.

That's it.

And in fact, when they took me for my feedback, they took me

to Sandia Desert and showed me all this equipment so that I

could actually see it.

And on the way, they waved us down.

They stopped us in the middle of the road because they fired

this sucker up here.

And when all these mirrors are focused on this tower, they

walked us up to the top of the tower, and a miniature sun is

formed right on top of that tower.

And you can smell the ozone because the sun actually

burst into being at the top of the tower.

You can smell the ozone in the air from that.

It's so hot and so bright, you can't look directly at it.

And he goes over there and watches them do that every

day at lunchtime.

So accidents do happen.

There's a reason I put that up, because this transits very

nicely into what I have to say about aliens.

In June of 1980, I was targeted on a segment of overhead film.

There were three frames in this film.

And I need to set this up a little bit, because what makes

this film really important is it was actually photography of a

ground base.

The facility was taken somewhere in an eastern block

country that we were in a Cold War with.

I can't name the country or the facility.

But suffice it to say that it was a very detailed photograph,

string of photographs.

And it was an important base and made a great

remote viewing target.

And I was asked to describe it in great detail.

Something else was caught in that same film.

And so on the one hand, they had something very definitive

that I could describe to confirm whether or not

I was on target.

At the same time, they had accidentally caught something

on film, which, if I described it, would also

confirm something.

See how remote viewing works?

Nice, huh?

@Andrzej_Zielinski,



And what I had to say was, can't be read.

Oh, my god.

OK, I'll try to read it for you.

I can't read it either.

Hard metallic object with hard metallic object

with observation ports across top as well as, yeah,

underside or undercarriage.

You get the idea anyway.

Outer edge is rotating at high speed, and the object is in

the processes of making a 90 degree turn.

In actuality, in the first frame, it was entering.

It was rolling over.

Second frame was almost completely turned.

The third frame, it was leaving the same edge it entered from.

These are remote viewing statements, by the way.

Object is traveling at about 4,500 miles per hour at about

14,000 feet altitude.

What's really nice about these photographs is that you have

the arc and speed of the photos, the depth of field,

and so you can estimate speed and angle and everything.

Motor power is a form of electromagnetically controlled fluid plasma.

That's what it looked like.

It's the only official UFO target that was ever done by Stargate Project.

I have the honor of having done it.

And it was captured on film by a KH-11 satellite.

It was actually traveling at 4,500 miles per hour.

Made a 90 degree left turn.

It was traveling at 14,000 feet, and its outer edges were rotating.

Now, about two months after I did the remote viewing,

the descriptions that I gave of the actual ground target simultaneous with this

were judged to be about 80% correct.

So my sketches and drawings of the ground target

were as valid as the remote viewing that I did of the UFO.

Two months after I did this, I actually got to go to the Pentagon

and see the frames blown up.

And when I saw them, I said my exact words were,

so that's what a UFO looks like.

Their exact words were, no, that's a...

One of the other things we did is,

once in a while we had an opportunity to do a training target,

what we call training targets.

I had no control over training targets because being a remote viewer,

I don't get to pick and choose my targets.

I never did, because I'm blind to them.

They just happen.

So I'm as mystified by the results of my remote viewing as is anyone else.

They're always a surprise to me.

So when I go in and do a remote viewing, whatever happens, happens.

The other part of denying the ego is that you never try to understand what's happening.

You never try to classify what's happening,

or you certainly never try to judge or come to some conclusion about your data.

You just go with it because it's not your job.

One of the things I learned a long time ago is that that's somebody else's job

to figure out what it is you said or figure out what it is you meant.

There's some other things in a minute that you'll see and I'll explain to you why that's important.

The data will explain to you why that's important.

The Clearwater, Missouri, March 27, 1973 UFO sighting occurred in a dam and reservoir area.

It's kind of an interesting sighting because there were a lot of things going on

and somebody suggested that it be targeted by remote viewers, I guess.

I don't know who suggested it or why, but it wound up being one of our training targets.

And I don't know who else might have targeted or didn't, but this is my result of that targeting.

That's the dam area.

The red lines are basically my perceptual area.

Imagine in a remote viewing sense me standing on the dam and that would be my view

as a remote viewer looking away from the dam.

And my first perception was an object moving that way, a light, big light,

about the size of a small aircraft carrier.

My second perception was a whole bunch of lights arriving and then imploding,

not exploding, but imploding.

Four of them arrived on a mountaintop and then imploded.

I was very specific about that.

So I had a sense that they just kind of arrived together and imploded.

Very strange.

Next perception was another aircraft carrier that went by from right to left.

Big, bright, white aircraft carrier, size light.

Third impression was the arrival of two big circular lights that came together in the form of a figure eight

and kind of wobbled there doing a dance.

And at that point, my monitor suggested that I join it.

That sounded like a pretty good idea.

I said, okay, lights are kind of interesting.

I think I'll just kind of slip on out there and see what the light's all about.

At which point I had an out-of-body.

It's just like being snapped right on my body. Bang.

And I found myself sitting in a white cube.

Perfectly white cube, opaque, very bright, with no windows or doors, just a pure white cube.

In no way to get out, in no way of knowing how I got in.

So I started looking for a seam or a door or window and couldn't seem to find one.

So I thought, oh, time to go back to my body now.

And nothing happened.

Oops.

Started getting nervous.

Being basically very curious, I kept looking and started getting more nervous.

At which time an apparition of my father beamed in.

You know, like in Star Trek, beamed in.

The problem is my father had been dead about two years.

And he, in a very gruff voice, pointed his hand over my shoulder.

Leave. You don't belong here.

And I went, nice try.

Whoever you are is not going to work, because my dad's never raised his voice to me.

My mother did, but not my dad.

And my dad looked very confused for a moment and then beamed out.

And I started looking a lot harder for the seam.

And then these two light beings appeared, or one light being appeared.

It looked very humanoid in shape, but had no face.

Just the light outline.

And it folded into two of itself.

And my perception was it was arguing with itself.

And that really made me feel uncomfortable.

And it raised an appendage and a light beam shot out of its appendage and hit me in the chest.

And I felt a moment of panic.

And then I said, I got angry.

And I said, get out of here. I'm tired of this.

And it argued some more and winked out.

And I started hammering on the side of this box, this cube.

And then stood there, thinking, this is too bizarre.

And then I had a sense that something reached inside my chest and started feeling around,

messing around inside my chest.

And you know when you strum a guitar string with your nail?

Well, something found a nerve inside me and strummed it.

And I was instantly, violently ill, like I was going to projectile vomit.

That's when I set bold upright in my body and collided heads with my monitor.

And we're both running around in a remote viewing room, holding our heads.

And we terminated a remote viewing session because we didn't know what was going on.

So that's the remote viewing event.

Total time was 15 minutes, full like an hour.

And I want to clue what was going on at that particular remote viewing site.

I do know that that was definitely multi-dimensional.

It was not a, what I call a classic UFO event.

In May of 1984 at the Monroe Institute, I had been training with Bob for almost 14 months,

learning to control my out-of-body experiences.

I had had spontaneous out-of-bodies for many years.

And Bob had been training with me in his lab at the last year of my time at the project, Stargate Project,

to teach me to control my out-of-bodies.

I wanted to see if controlled out-of-bodies were better at producing information,

collection information than remote viewing.

It turns out you can do very specific things with out-of-bodies that you can't do with remote viewing,

but I don't think it's as good.

If you want to know how the trigger mechanism works on a Chinese nuclear weapon,

out-of-bodies better because you can go to the Chinese nuclear weapon and put your face in it, look around,

do detailed drawing.

But if you want to know where all the parts from the weapon came from, remote viewing is better,

because all the parts are intricately linked together, data-wise.

So things are different for how you want to do things.

In any event, during that period, my training officer, Skip Outwater,

would come in from the project and test me to see whether or not my remote viewing was getting any better.

And one of his tests that he brought, one of the training tests that he brought,

was a target that I didn't know anything about.

Normally, I did mundane targets like quasi-military targets.

Well, this particular week, he brought a Mars target.

I didn't know it was a Mars target.

But he gave a seal envelope needed at Bob Monroe.

He gave a seal envelope to Bob Monroe, which inside had a card that said Mars 1 million years BC.

Bob thought it was another mundane target as well.

And he had a list of coordinates.

So Bob had this card in his shirt pocket, and we had a list of coordinates as targets.

And the first set of coordinates was 44.89 degrees, 9.55 degrees west.

I didn't know anything about the targets as I was laying in a dark black cube in the lab,

floating on a sea of salt, listening to hemi-sink tapes.

And the first thing I heard was a coordinates.

And this was my response.

I got a great view of a pyramid form sitting in a large depression.

It's yellowish ochre colored.

I get clouds, a severe storm, major geological trauma.

Then I was asked to visit the site before the trauma.

They said, go back before the trauma.

They said, all the dirt had disappeared.

There were now smooth walls. Everything was flat, megalithic.

I said something about, gee, is this a new pyramid?

Did they discover a new pyramid?

Because it's really large.

Shadow of people, fragments, memory of people.

They said, go back to when they were there.

Large people, thin and tall, wearing strange clothes, skin tight, very tight, almost can't see them.

This is the actual target based on the coordinates.

That's the face everybody's always referring to on Mars.

This is actually the depressed area.

This is the pyramid.

It's actually a double layered pyramid.

This is a second set of coordinates that I got.

In a canyon looking up steep high walls that go on forever.

Very intricate, huge sections of smooth stone.

Carved out.

Getting very large structures.

Rabbit-worn of huge corridors and rooms.

They said the rooms were really large.

Again, I said something to them about,

this has got to be some new pyramids or something,

because I don't remember ever seeing rooms this size.

In Giza or anywhere like that.

That's a canyon.

And that's the pyramid.

Now what's really interesting about this particular pyramid,

you notice it's sitting on the side of the impact crater.

That's a real trick.

Because that means the pyramid had to be put there after the impact crater.

Because if the impact crater hit after the pyramid was there,

it would have destroyed the pyramid.

You can't have one and not the other.

You understand what I'm saying?

If that crater appeared after the pyramid,

it would have destroyed that pyramid.

The other interesting thing about this picture is,

you can measure the shadow of the crater,

and based on the angle of the sun,

you can estimate the size of the crater wall as being 3,000 meters tall.

So that's a pretty deep crater.

Now look at the shadow on the pyramid.

Pretty tall pyramid.

That's a 20,000 meter tall pyramid.

Pretty big, huh?

That's not the only thing interesting.

That pyramid had to have been formed after the crater was formed.

Here's something else interesting.

That pyramid's even closer to the edge.

And here's an even more interesting fact.

There's the road in, there's the road out.

I just find these really remarkable pictures.

Here's another, this is a general area.

The pyramid's huge but different this time.

The reason these were different is because they were a cluster.

These are like shelters from storms.

Designed for sleeping, I specified hibernation,

sleeping through savage storms.

I'm asked to find out why.

They're an ancient people trying to survive that's past their time and age.

They're waiting for the return of someone sent to find a new home.

Their world passed through the tail of a comet.

I had a sense that their atmosphere was stripped away or destabilized

when it passed through the tail of the comet.

This is an old fort.

Now what's interesting about the old fort,

and it's something most people don't recognize,

this is actually a pyramid.

That's one side, that's the other side, that's the other side.

The tip is missing off the top and it's hollow.

I don't know if you can see that.

Kind of interesting, isn't it?

They call it the old fort.

It's always referred to as the old fort.

But that's a pyramid that's been tipped off.

The tip's been taken off.

That's a grouping of pyramids.

And that's a building, or what's left of a building on a sort of a plateau.

And that's a drawing I did of the larger beings.

I think in actuality, there really are no such thing as Martians.

What I think Martians are is us.

I think we're descendants of the original inhabitants of Mars.

And we're the ones that never went back.

Giving an idea of size,

that's the rough size of the pyramid at Giza.

Giving an idea of scale.

So targeting events over time,

if you want to go back and target things as a remote viewer,

I selected some things.

Now, when I did my collection of my material for Ultimate Time Machine,

I decided I would target some things that are UFOs.

When I did the collection of the material for Ultimate Time Machine,

it's very difficult to target yourself because you're front-loaded.

So obviously when I collected the material for Ultimate Time Machine,

I would be front-loading myself.

So the way I did that is I laid the book out very deliberately.

I got with a sociologist and some other people

and I laid out an outline for data, how data should be outlined.

And under the outline, I wrote out what I thought would be

the most interesting questions that people might ask about the future.

And I came up with something like three or four hundred questions.

And I wrote each of those questions out on a three-by-five card.

At the same time, I took some specific UFO events

and I wrote those out on three-by-five cards and I threw those in the pile.

And I put each of those three-by-five cards into a opaque envelope that you can't see through.

And I put all those in one of those big green leaf bags.

You see those big green leaf bags?

And I'd shake it up and put it in the corner of my office.

And every day I'd take that green leaf bag and I'd shake it up and I'd pull a card out or an envelope.

And I'd put it up on my computer and I'd remote view it

and I'd type out a paragraph or a page or I'd do a sketch or I'd do whatever.

And then I'd open the envelope and if the question or whatever in the envelope matched whatever I had done,

I'd file it and I'd tear up the card or I'd staple it to the data and file it.

If it didn't, I'd put the card back in another envelope, stick it back in the leaf bag and destroy the data.

And I did that for four years.

That's how I got the data for Ultimate Time Machine.

That's also how I got the data for what I'm going to show you.

So it was kind of hard collecting the data.

It was the only way I could stay blind to the material.

You get enough of that and you pretty much stay blind.

So the trick was finding real UFOs to target.

I wanted real UFOs, things I could trust.

The first one I picked was November 17, 1986, 1710 Japanese Airlines 747 cargo plane over Alaska.

There's only three. I'm going to read them to you because you'll understand why I picked them.

I wanted things that I absolutely knew were alien craft,

not possibly ours, possibly theirs, possibly somebody else's.

I wanted real alien craft.

On November 17, 1986 at 1710,

airline officer Kinju Tara Uchi, who was piling a 747 cargo plane,

first saw what he at first thought were lights coming from a military aircraft.

During the next half hour, he and his crew realized that things of an unearthly nature had joined them in the skies.

The pilot, first officer, and flight engineer saw two lighted structures about the same size as the body of a DC-8 jet.

Tara Uchi's words moving about 1,000 feet in front of their cargo plane.

Tara Uchi's radio communications to Anchorage flight control were strangely garbled,

but enough got through that Anchorage urgently contacted a nearby Air Force radar station to see what they were picking up.

At various times during the event, the UFOs were tracked by the 747 onboard radar and by the Air Force ground radar confirmed.

As the sky darkened, the UFOs paced the 747 and were finally lost in a distant horizon.

Then a pale white light appeared behind the aircraft, silhouetted against the lights on the ground.

It looked like an immense, Saturn-shaped object the size Tara Uchi estimated of two small aircraft carriers.

He thought it was a mothership that had carried the two smaller objects themselves of no small size.

The Anchorage radar was recording the object's presence all along.

For the first time the crew felt fear.

By now the aircraft was running low on fuel and the captain requested permission to land in order to escape.

The UFO finally vanished off radar at 1739.

That's obviously an alien craft.

So I targeted that one.

November 7, 1975, Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls, Montana.

On November 7, 1975, remote electronic sensors at Malmstrom Air Force Base, home of more than 20-minute-man missiles,

indicated that something had violated radar, violated site security.

Two officers were monitoring the signals called site security who in turn dispatched a helicopter and a sabotage alert team to investigate.

As the SAT team approached the area in question, they could see an orange glowing object.

As they approached, as they slowly closed in, they could see that the object was tremendous in size.

They radioed to the launch control facility and informed them that they were witnessing a brightly glowing orange football field-sized disc.

The SAT was ordered to proceed. They refused to do so.

Now, I don't know a SAT team that's ever refused an order, except this one.

The object started to rise slowly, and when it reached 1,000 feet, it was picked up on radar by NORAD,

and as a result, two F-106 jet interceptors were launched immediately.

As the jets approached, the object shot away vertically and was last seen on radar at 200,000 feet.

The operators at launch control facility noticed that the missiles were indicating that they had been tampered with.

After a series of checks, it was established that all the missiles that had their target coordinates changed.

That's obviously an alien craft.

And the Clearwater Lake, Missouri incident, because it's a favorite of mine.

So those are three I stuck in my leaf bag.

I thought, what the heck? Those are definitely aliens.

I wanted to know more.

This is the reason why I went out of my way to make sure I was targeting alien craft.

This is a target.

I used to have remote viewing get-togethers, I call them get-togethers, back in 84, 85, 86.

This is the copy of a target done in July of 85.

This actually was drawn by someone as a target.

That's all they drew.

It was a double blind.

The target was in a double-wrapped-a-pick envelope.

So I'd like to know what the target was.

Cool, huh?

Everybody jumped on it.

UFO, aliens.

The problem was, I will tell you the data that went along with this.

They said, I'm getting a UFO, but it's really weird because when I went on board,

it had normal instrumentation, just like a jet.

And there were two guys in military uniforms and they said, you don't belong here, get off.

Interesting, huh?

And I saved that.

I ran to my desk drawer and when the first Fy 117 was shown on television,

I ran to my desk drawer and got that out.

And it looked just like the first shots they showed us on television.

When they rolled it out of the hanger, I went, whoa, is that cool or what?

She even put wheels on it, for God's sake.

That's how you can, I mean, we're mixing data all the time.

That's why I really wanted to make sure I got alien crap.

So, April 19, 1998, squares within squares, that's the first result I got,

which I found very interesting since I spent so much time in an opaque white cube.

Squares within squares.

I've also gotten telephone booths.

I've been inside telephone booths, inside telephone booths.

Or telephone booth-like places.

Glass rooms inside glass rooms.

I think probably it's a confounding place.

It's a place designed to confound.

It may even be a trick of the mind that they play.

Designed to muddle our senses.

Trying to target a UFO, it may even be a screen.

I said that remote viewers can't be blocked. You can't be.

I didn't say you couldn't be deceived.

One of the ways that you hide things from remote viewers is by hiding them within things that look similar.

If you want to hide one of these from a remote viewer, what's the best place to hide it in a pile of them?

So one of these cubes is probably real. The rest aren't.

One of the opaque cubes is probably real. The rest aren't.

One of the aliens is probably real. The rest aren't.

That's the best place to hide.

You've got to think of that.

It's the other reason why remote viewers cannot be wedded to an idea.

You have to stay completely unbiased in your data.

You can't come to conclusions about the data.

You can't say automatically they're from Gemini or Syria or wherever.

You can't automatically assume anything about your data because if you do, you're dead in the water.

You will automatically start being prejudiced towards your data.

April 6, 1998.

The first line up here I started out with, right here, cave.

And I crossed it out and wrote analytic overlay.

I actually thought I was drawing a picture of a cave originally. It was so big.

This is the image of a human being giving an idea of scale.

I think the lower portion is drive. That's all drive unit.

And it's some kind of vehicle.

I always say a taste of these metals.

It's approximate size.

Wait, this is millions. 1.5 million pounds. It's really huge.

And I think what this is, it's probably an empty transport.

I think all the really big ships are all mother ships.

They're all transport ships.

And I don't think they do anything other than beam things in and beam things out.

I think all their vehicles are interdimensional.

They're time machines. They're portages. They come and they go.

And I think the only time we see them is when they're coming and when they're going.

The rest of the time they have an envelope or a way of hiding.

But they're just not here. They come and they go. That's their only function.

They're carriers.

The smaller ships are the ones that stick around.

They're the ones that are brought in and leave.

Or left here rather.

Those are the ones that we actually see more of.

But the big ones, the mother ships are the ones that come and go.

They're the ones that carry things in and carry things out.

The transport vehicles.

That's my sense of it anyway.

This one's a little hard to see.

This is kind of a figure eight.

But it kind of waffles around the whole area.

And this is, that word there is corona.

It creates a corona around the vehicle.

And that's actually the vehicle, I think.

It's a sketch I was doing.

And I think that figure eight is kind of a force field of some kind.

That's a larger sense of it.

And what it does is it creates a, you can't read the writing, I know.

That's a corona.

And that right there is, I call that a singularity.

And that's a larger figure eight.

And this is, narrows into the way it bends or twists space-time in some way.

I'm not exactly sure how that works.

It's just the way it feels or the way I sense it in the remote viewing.

But that's the way the mother ships come and go, maybe.

I think they have two different kinds of drive.

The star to star is the mother ship.

And the planetary is the smaller ships.

They have the anti-gravity drives.

Or better than anti-gravity, I think they negate inertia.

It would be a better way to say it.

By negating inertia, what that means is it's better than anti-gravity.

When you negate inertia, all you have to do is flick your little finger

and you just keep moving the opposite direction

until you flick your little finger in the other direction.

So it takes no energy at all to do miraculous things.

If you have no inertia in your body, you can basically lean in one direction

and you just keep moving in the direction you lean until you lean the opposite direction.

It's a better mode of mobility.

This is how a drive works, I think.

I don't understand it, I just write it down.

This is a negative side, positive side.

There's some kind of turbine force that runs this way.

This is a liquid metal in here.

But the liquid metal is made up of something I call neutral liquid nanometal,

for lack of a different word.

And they're individual little fragments so small you can't see them,

but they're almost can't see them.

They're individually designed to create a field

and there's a centrifuge force that pushes them to the outside of the field in some way.

Maybe that's meaningful to somebody.

Like I say, I just produce the data.

I don't worry about how it works.

Maybe that's meaningful to somebody.

Somebody will get the tape and go, oh yeah, that helps.

I don't know.

Maybe it's a way of producing the corona or something.

Alien sleeping pod.

When you get inside the ship and you start looking for aliens,

you almost never see one.

I think that's a deliberate problem.

I think they know when you're looking at them or trying to look at them.

The interesting thing about an alien sleeping pod is that

I'm not sure if it's used for sleep.

I'm not sure if that's what it is.

My sense of it is it may be a rejuvenation pod

or a sleeping pod or a hideout.

I don't know what it is.

But I do know that that's what they wear.

That's a suit of some kind,

a skin of some kind,

an environmental unit of some kind

when they're not in that pod.

It's kind of interesting.

The only other part of an alien I've ever seen

is their hand on a control.

It looks very much like our hand.

The difference being it's long and it's thin

and it has very ugly nails.

Very pointed, very narrow.

Wouldn't want to get in a cat fight with them

unless I was armed.

But they're very gentle with them.

That's my sense.

I've never seen a whole alien outside of a suit.

I think a very tiny fraction of UFOs are alien aircraft.

Very small fraction.

Maybe one quarter of one percent.

I think the vast majority of UFOs are home-built.

The reason I say that is because of all the damage they do.

I think the actual alien craft

are detuned to our time space.

So they don't do a lot of damage to our time space.

Except when they actually make contact with it,

which is very rare.

I think they're only visible when they're morphing in and out of our time space.

They deliberately avoid us otherwise.

I think they make contact individually.

They have a sense of who's open to contact and who isn't.

And it's not who's open in a sense of who will really want to talk to them,

but who's open in the sense of who's not going to run off

and get something and whack them to death.

Or who's not going to get ugly

or who's not going to have a coronary when they actually see one.

Or who isn't going to turn them into...

see what I got or turn them into a mystical being or whatever.

I think the larger ships are transports only.

I think all of their ships are not built, they're grown.

I think they're actually grown like crystals.

I got a lot of remote viewing data on the ship's construction,

but it's impossible to display.

You can't draw it.

It's even difficult to talk about.

The ships communicate with the occupants.

It's almost like organic or chemical in some way, neurological in some way.

They actually grow the ship on a molecule to molecule basis.

They're so light and intricately strong like the structure of a bone would be.

Everything on board the ship is intricately tied to their space-time.

In other words, when they're here, it's still tied to their space-time, not ours.

So it's very difficult for us to relate to it and them to relate to us in a space-time sense.

Everything on board is mentally tied to their ship and to each other.

So they know more about what's going on within their ship and within each other.

So they're very sensitive to when they've been invaded by another entity.

We've never seen an alien that is not wearing a suit.

So when you see the guys with the funny eyes and a little slit for the nose and a little slit for the mouth, that's a suit.

That's an environmental suit.

You're not seeing the alien.

And the reason why you're not seeing the alien is because they're probably but ugly.

I mean, what's your reaction in most cases when you see that big, hairy, ugly cockroach?

They understand that we have deep-seated emotional reactions to some things.

They understand that.

And so they're not going to show us what they look like.

There's probably few human beings on the planet that have ever seen a truly stripped-down alien.

They know that we probably couldn't handle it yet.

And it's probably why we won't have a full species-to-species contact for a long time.

Because they see what we do when we react to other humans of different color or different culture or different religion.

I mean, they watch our TV.

I mean, it's sad, but it's true.

So we see aliens in suits.

And that's why they make contact with us as individuals.

In the hopes that maybe they can alter what's going on.

And I covered my last item.

So if there are any questions...

Okay.

Do you think you could locate Osama bin Laden?

No.

Piece of cake. He's in Pakistan.

Piece of cake.

For just a little operating money, I'd go get him.

Hi.

From your experience with the military and the program,

I'd like to know whether there's been any study of the possibility of alternative timelines in our physical reality, if you like.

And whether there's the possibility of any bleed-through, if you like, from these alternative timelines into ours, which might corrupt any results.

I'll give you my philosophy on time.

For me, all of time is an illusion.

So in my cosmology of time, all time is.

That means from the very beginning of time to the very end of time,

all possibilities for everything that could ever be or ever could have been is.

So when you talk about all probabilities, they all are. They all exist.

So that opens the door to multiple incarnations.

So I believe that...

I believe in multiple incarnations, but not multiple reincarnations.

So I believe that rather than being reincarnated 10,000 times, I believe I'm living 10,000 lives simultaneously.

So is there a possibility for bleed-through of information? Absolutely.

Is there a possibility of one interfering with the other, only in so much as it would affect my decision-making?

No.

Does that make sense?

Can you expand on that?

Well, you know, people always say,

well, if you make a prediction based on remote viewing and it happens, then everything's preconceived.

And that can't be true. It's just a lucky guess.

If I make a prediction and it doesn't happen, then I'm just simply wrong.

Or you can look at it another way. If you make a prediction and somebody says,

well, okay, we just simply will do something to make that not happen, then your prediction was wrong.

Or, you know, we altered the future. And my answer to that is no, I was just simply wrong.

You didn't do anything to change it.

I mean, you make more out of remote viewing and predicting than it actually is.

It's just simply making a good, wild guess.

I mean, it's not a big deal.

Thanks.

Joe, I have admired your work for many years.

Thank you.

I have talked to a lot of remote viewers who know you well, and I know that you're highly regarded and respected.

On your extensive travels throughout the universe, I have only one simple question.

Have you ever, in those extensive travels, like Bob Monroe made regularly,

have you ever encountered what you would think of as the original creative source?

There's a lot of evidence for what I call the grand designer or the grand engineer.

There's a lot of evidence for the originator or the...

I wish I could say that I have.

I've seen so much evidence for God, but I have not seen God.

But in my first near-death experience, I had a classic near-death experience in 1970,

where I came out of the tunnel and was enveloped by a white light.

And for many, many years, I called the white light God because it was the most all-encompassing feelings of purity and completeness that I had ever felt.

And it was just... I just had never felt so totally loved and complete in my whole life.

And the problem was I had another near-death experience in 1985.

And in the second near-death experience, I was not allowed to go to the white light.

I was only allowed to see it from a distance.

There were humanities that kept me local.

And as much as I wanted to go to the white light, I was not allowed to.

I was only allowed to view it from a distance.

The problem was, in the second experience, viewing it from a distance, I could see the white light had edges.

And it created a huge, philosophic problem for me.

In my definition of God, the beginner, the beginning and the end, the grand creator cannot have edges.

So I had a huge, philosophic problem to deal with.

So I went back over all my feelings for... I spent a year and a half cooking on that.

And the conclusion I came to is that what the white light probably is, is what I call the totality of self.

It's what we become when we're no longer physical.

It's the energy body, the energy being, that we truly are when we're not physical.

It's a summation of all our lives that come together.

It's the reason we become sure that we know the answer to the universe.

It's a summation of our knowledge.

And if, as an energy being, if that's what we feel as an energy being, then whatever created us, if there is a God, must be way and above, beyond that.

So for me to understand what God is, I'm going to have to understand more about what the totality of self is, what I am.

And as a being, I haven't begun to scratch the surface of that.

And as a being to think, to even remotely think that I exist alone in a universe filled with life, I mean teeming with life.

To think that I know anything about it is insane.

And it does dishonor to the idea of God to stand up and say, I worship God when I don't even understand the limits of what I am and what the rest of life is.

It does a disservice.

So my goal is to try to figure out more about what and who I am and how I can be a better human being and find out how to interact more with the rest of life, whatever that term means in the universe.

And then by doing that, maybe honor whatever that grand engineer is.

But there is evidence there is a grand engineer.

I think other life out there understands it better than we do.

I don't know if that answers your question.

Joe, that does answer a lot of questions.

In my own summary, I think you know a hell of a lot more about the final question than you would admit.

And Joe, thank you very much.

Thanks.

Appreciate it.

That was very profound, so this is going to sound great.

I can't, I can't hear you.

I can't hear you.

That was so profound that this will sound mundane, but have you ever...

Can you bring that down?

Thank you.

That was very profound and this will sound mundane.

But have you ever done a like in a double blind controlled study, a thing where you were tasked, you know what was in the envelope and you did your drawing?

I can't hear you.

Okay.

Have you ever been tasked to do...

Can you hear me now?

I'm sorry.

Have you ever been tasked to do something that was in the envelope and you did your drawing and it was correct.

But then you found out that that actually occurred after you did the drawing where they went and put whatever it was in the envelope after you did your remote feeling which would confirm for me the collapse of time, you know?

I will tell you a cute story.

One of the problems we have in the lab is that in many cases we deal with hard-nosed scientists and in a lot of cases we like to borrow things from other labs and borrow the cooperation of other labs.

In many cases overseas.

We've done a lot of research in Hungary and Russia and some other places.

And many of these scientists, they've heard about remote viewing but they're not completely convinced.

And we have a little travel kit on our computer that we carry.

When I say we, Dr. Edwin May and I carry a little travel kit on our computer.

What it is, it's a remote viewing program and it contains a few hundred targets.

There are pictures, locations all over the world and these are picture targets and they're in a file.

And the way the program works is we can actually do a remote viewing demonstration where we randomly select the target.

And the target can be a picture, any picture out of the file.

And it's an ironclad demonstration where it can't be messed with.

Once you initiate the program, you do the remote viewing, you enter the data and you have to enter the data first before it gives you the picture.

So you can't cheat.

This is a really difficult thing to do.

There's a little hook to the demonstration that we don't tell anybody about.

And we let them run it.

We give them the computer, we let them run it, they enter all the data and everything's done.

You do the remote viewing and all this sort of thing.

And at the very end of the demonstration, when you do the remote viewing, they have a last button they push and where it displays the actual target.

Just before that, the computer produces six targets, one of which is the real target.

And they get the judge.

They look at your data that you've drawn and they get to pick based on your drawing which ones they think is the actual target.

They judge it.

They go, based on your drawings, I think this is a first place match, this is a second place match, this is a third place match.

And they actually enter their judging.

So when all that's done and filed, after they've judged the actual results, then they hit the last button and it says, this is the real target.

So they can see how good you were, whether it was a first place match, second place match, that sort of thing.

And when they hit that last button, it gives them the real result.

Well, what we don't tell them is up until they hit that last button, the target doesn't exist.

The random number generator does not generate the random pick until the last button's picked, the last button's hit.

So those six targets that are randomly selected, one of those will be the actual target.

But the computer hasn't picked which one yet.

So they don't even know, the computer doesn't even know which the target actually is until they get to the last button punched.

And in many cases, most cases, in fact, the remote viewing's done, the judging's done, everything's done, up until that last button push.

Okay?

In almost all cases, it's a first place match and they select the target by hitting the button.

Thank you.

Joe, a couple questions.

Many times on these talk shows, the ones you've been on, but not when you were on them, I've heard them refer to a dream George Washington had where the Chinese would be invading America.

I wonder if you've ever done any remote viewing on that.

I got a couple other questions too.

No, I've not heard them.

Oh yeah, it's been mentioned several times.

Another thing is when I was at the UFO Museum in Roswell about six years ago, I saw two old gentlemen in the inside and I asked them, have you seen a UFO?

And they said, oh yeah, we're on the baton death march and two giant cylinders swooped down over us and took off.

That's probably something you never heard of, but maybe you might remote view that.

Probably true, yeah.

And finally, if you've ever remote viewed this or might, the neocons who fill out the Bush administration, who in fact were the ones who got them to run for president in the first place, are now demanding that we invade Iran and Syria.

Do you see that happening or have you ever remote viewed that?

Do you have any comments?

Actually, there's a prediction in my ultimate time machine that predicts further expansion of the war in Iraq.

But it'll be based on some other actions, but eventually I see that happening in the Middle East.

With regard to human-made craft that are considered UFOs, have you done or anybody you know done any remote viewing that indicates that the technology using those approaches the alien-made UFO craft in any way?

I've actually done very little targeting of anything that suggests alien-built craft, but I have done some targeting of craft that I think are U.S. made.

In 1960, later part of 65, early 66, when I was stationed in Alutra in the Bahamas, I was illuminated by a craft.

I and a partner that was stationed there with me were on the Air Sea Rescue Unit, and we were going back to our quarters very late at night.

It was probably one o'clock in the morning, and we were crossing some sand dunes.

We were actually taking a shortcut.

Alutra is a very narrow island, and it's probably half a mile wide at the point where we were living.

And we're crossing sand dunes at a tracking site there, a downrange tracking site at Governor's Harbor.

And in the middle of the sand dunes, we were suddenly illuminated by something, and we looked up, and it was a disk probably, I don't know, 130 feet across hovering directly above us.

And we were caught in this cone of illumination, and it was like being in a bell jar.

We couldn't, suddenly couldn't hear anything.

No waves, the waves were right there on the ocean side.

We couldn't hear a breaking on the shore, and the whole event lasted maybe 30 seconds.

And you could see panel lines in it, you know, opaque windows and that sort of thing.

And our sense was it, the light winked out, and we saw it shoot over the horizon.

And his name was Steve. He and I looked at each other, didn't say a word, went back to the bar, and proceeded to get drunk.

And we discussed it, and our decision was not to tell anybody, because we were both in the Army, and we didn't want to get shipped out to Southeast Asia.

And the problem was the next morning we both got up, we were both sick.

We were both violently ill, and we had severe radiation burns.

And the problem was he was very, very sick, because I was the diver in the unit,

and I had logged probably a thousand hours of diving up until then.

So I was pretty dark, I was dark brown from the sun, so I didn't get burned badly.

I just had to take iodine for a week, but they shipped him off the Homestead Air Force Base for two weeks.

And to this day, he has an imprint of his shirt burned into his chest, and he can't go out in the sun.

He's sun sensitive.

And the other part about it was interesting is for about two years, all he could remember was he had memories of a radiator blowing up in his face.

You know, a truck radiator. And the problem was we had no truck.

I remembered everything in detail, except I just had a memory of us being irradiated.

And there might be a whole lot of other things that happened, but I don't have any memory of it.

But I thought it was kind of interesting.

I think it was aircraft. I don't think it was alien.

So there's that, and there's a couple other events that I've experienced that I think probably have to do with aircraft.

We're pretty sloppy. You know, I think we build things and then try them out, and we hurt people with them.

The aliens aren't that way. They don't do that sort of thing. It's not my sense that they do that sort of thing.

And then the other part of it with aliens is that they leave you with good feelings.

You know, they don't go away leaving you with bad feelings.

The other thing, I've had a couple interactions in my home with aliens.

And I didn't even notice that they were going on, except my cats told me.

My cats notice aliens before I do.

I've had aliens cutting through my house.

I don't know if they're going somewhere or if they're doing something.

But my cats have forewarned me by growling.

But now they don't growl anymore. They just notice.

Thank you.

When you said a while ago that the alien spacecraft, but so many of them were ours,

because the alien spacecraft didn't cause damage, but ours caused damage, what did you mean by that?

What I mean is that we're building craft that we call UFOs because we don't know what else to call them.

We see them in the sky and are doing funny things, so we call them UFOs.

But they're not alien.

There are things we build in a factory somewhere or build underground.

We're building them, but they're not alien origin.

We're building saucers, basically.

We're building craft that look like saucers.

One of the things that I'm not sure everybody understands this,

but I don't know if you're aware of it or not, but the B-2 bomber,

the B-2 bomber probably with its engine configuration and bomb load and weight and everything,

probably can't get off the ground.

I don't know if you're aware of that or not.

It can't fly.

So how does it get off the ground?

No, it actually uses modern technology.

It uses electrostatic energy to create a corona around itself.

It actually gets more lift that way.

It gets a 30% increase in lift.

But the corona that it creates causes it to look round in the sky at night.

So you think, then, that we are building several different types of crafts, for example?

No, I think we see the B-2 bomber flying, and it's slightly illuminated by the electrostatic corona,

and we think it's a UFO.

And then we mix that data in with alien craft.

So we're mixing data.

We're creating our own disinformation file.

And you see it causes a problem for us.

You understand what I'm saying?

So it's kind of like the same problem that we suffered during the war, during all our wars.

When we have plane spotters, you have to take people and you have to teach them the skill of differentiating between them and us.

Teaching people the skills of identifying real alien craft from non-alien craft.

Because things start looking very similar.

So, like, when they reported the lights over Phoenix and that supposedly huge craft,

you think that could have been just one of ours?

Well, it could be an alien craft.

I'm not saying it might or might not be.

It depends on the circumstance.

I'm just saying that you got to be really careful not to leap to a conclusion based on insufficient data.

That's all.

Joe, what about the benevolent space brothers that Adamska used to describe to us,

and that all the planets in our solar system are occupied and we don't hear about them.

All we hear about is the bad guys. Have you viewed that?

I think it's just like us here.

There are some good guys and there are some bad guys.

And, you know, it's like remote viewing.

I wish I could say that everybody who's a really good or exceptional remote viewer is a good guy.

They're not.

There's a lot of people out there that are remote viewing that are not good guys.

In October of 2000, I went to Russia.

I spent three weeks in the Russian remote viewing facility.

And I met all my counterparts.

And I don't talk about it because I promised I wouldn't.

And maybe one day I'll get permission to do that.

But I met some very, very nice people.

They're male and female.

And they're excellent remote viewers.

And I met remote viewers in Budapest, Hungary.

And I met remote viewers that are Chinese.

And I met remote viewers that are Italian.

And I met remote viewers that are Israeli.

I met really good remote viewers.

And if you think there are only good remote viewers, you're wrong.

There are probably remote viewers that are working for Al Qaeda.

There are bad remote viewers, too.

Same with the aliens.

Is the claim that every planet in our solar system is inhabited?

There might be.

There might be.

And there are good people and there are bad people.

I mean, the universe in my mind is teaming with life.

And that's from the smallest microbe all the way up to intelligent beings.

And to assume otherwise, I think, is foolishness.

I would assume just the opposite.

I think that the universe is teaming with life.

Just one question. Have you remote viewed?

I can't hear.

Have you remote viewed Pine Gap?

Pine Gap?

In Australia.

In Australia?

I don't have to.

I know what goes on at Pine Gap.

I can't say.

I can't say or expand on it.

Yeah, I don't think you have to worry about Pine Gap, though.

I'll tell you that.

Honestly, don't have to.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

@Andrzej_Zielinski, idąc tym tropem i sięgając do mitów obszaru żyznego półksiężyca oraz śródziemnomorza oznaczałby to, że wiara w Jehowę / Zeusa / Marduka / Enlina - inaczej Baala (Pana) jest (w uproszczeniu) wiarą w boga szkodzącego człowiekowi, a ukłon w stosunku do Lucyfera / Prometeusza / Enkiego jest ukłonem w kierunku zbuntowanego kosmity jaki chciał ludziom pomóc. Co terasss?
@Emrys_Vledig, Mity sumeryjskie Enki i Enlil. Jeżeli to prawda co przekazują to powinniśmy być dozgonnie wdzięczni Enkiemu.

Niestety brakuje nam historii ludzkości. Tej zakazanej historii, domyślam się ze obcy są znacznie bardziej z nią obeznani niż my (w końcu są bardziej zaawansowani od dawna).

Najgorsze jest to że pozbawienie kontekstu historycznego też jest formą manipulacji. Nie znasz swojej historii => łatwo ją zmienić / ulepić / odkształcić => tobą manipulować.

Bardzo bym chciał poznać prawdziwą historię świata tę której wiedze mają kosmici ale tez musiał bym być ostrożny w jej przyjmowaniu.

Co do samych imion starożytnych bóstw, tu nie ma pewności, że mówi się o tych samych istotach. Różne języki potrafią zmieniać, przeinaczać czy nawet mylić dane osoby. W przypadku legendy ostrożniej by było kierować się kontekstem danej legendy i konkretnych działań przypisanych danemu bóstwu.
@Andrzej_Zielinski, ten ich opis w 95% pasuje do Żydów
@Syncesarza, Nie można wykluczyć. Agenci kosmity Jahweh. Tylko ciekaw jestem jak by Jahweh odbierał żydów dziś. Cyniczne, narcystyczne i psychopatyczne plemię, które nawet Jahweh postrzega jako narzędzie do osiągania swoich celów.

Czy nie czuł by się zgorszony ich działaniami. Z drugiej strony sam miał dużo za uszami, więc na dwoje babka wróżyła.

Żydzi zawsze dziwnym trafem byli nadreprezentacją w wszelkich nieetycznych działaniach. Nie zdziwię się gdyby pośród żydów była tak samo nadreprezentacja ukrytych obcych.
@Andrzej_Zielinski, tylko po co mieliby nam dać potencjalną możliwość budowania technologii żeby teraz ją ograniczać tak byśmy nigdy nie ruszyli się z tej planety
@PostironicznyPowerUser, nie jest łatwo zgasić potencjał całej ludzkości do rozwoju technologicznego. A aktualnie praktycznie wszędzie na świecie dąży się do ogłupienia ludzi
@PostironicznyPowerUser, Polityka, coś za coś. Wistle blowerzy od UFO twierdzą, że rząd USA ma umowę z jedną lub więcej obcych ras. Zgodził się na porwania / i uprowadzenia ludzi (pod warunkiem przekazania list uprowadzonych) w zamian za technologię.

Z dziedziny archeologii zakazanej wiemy, że nasze poprzednie plemienia były na znacznie wyższym stopniu zaawansowania niż oficjalna nauka przyjmuje. Być może stali za tym obcy. Legendy też wskazują, że ludzie byli siłą roboczą (niewolnikami) tyle żeby wykonać pracę potrzebne są narzędzia czyli jest potrzebny pewien stopień zaawansowania.
@Dps, Temat pośredni. Klub Rzymski forsuje politykę depopulacji wszelkimi możliwymi sposobami. Smiercionka zbyt wcześnie została odkryta przez publikę i teraz nacisk jest kładziony na konflikt kinetyczny jako ogranicznik populacji.

Nie można wykluczyć że pośród Klubu Rzymskiego są obcy udający ludzi. Na razie poszlaka pośrednią jest stosowana polityka tej organizacji.