@pieklomezczyzn, nie mój tekst ale się pod nim w pełni podpisuję:
Abortions increase the overall quality of life. Fetuses that are aborted are usually getting aborted by parents who are not in a good position to raise a child or aren't ready. By forcing them to keep the child, it is possible that they will resent the child for having fucked up their life, leading to poor parenting and a fucked up child. If you allow them to abort, you let them get their lives together before raising a child, bettering their quality of life as well as their child's. They will also be more likely to give good parenting because they will be in a better state of mind (and likely older and therefore more experienced). There is no societal advantage to preventing abortions. Unwanted kids are more likely to turn out bad. Abortions effectively reduce crime in the long run.
For the argument of "it's a human being". Until a certain point, no it isn't. If it cannot survive without its host (the mother), then it is not an independant living creature, which means it cannot be a human being. Until the fetus can live on its own, detached from the mother, it is closer to being an organ or parasite than it is to being a human being. It's like saying a law student is a lawyer. No they're not. They are going to be, but they currently aren't. Things progress and become new things. If you use the logic that fetuses are human beings, then you can easily stretch it out to saying that every fucking ovocyte is as well and that the mother kills a child every period.
As for the argument of morality, abortions are more moral in the long run as they effectively help increase the average quality of the citizens, by allowing parents who aren't settled into their lives to settle into their lives before getting a child. The child is statistically more likely to be successful, less likely to be delinquent. The child is also less likely to be born into a broken home, reducing his chances of long term mental issues.
@Sol_Ziemi, tak, i wcale nie ma nic do polityki. W tym materiale wrzucanie do tego kościoła, płakanie jak to nie wszystkim kościół pasuje, jak to można nie wierzyć w boga itd. Julki julkami, ale w samym artykule gówno walka między lewą, a prawą stroną. Dlatego wyciąłem tag polityka ze swojego feeda. Żeby tego nie widzieć, bo mnie to nie interesuje. @Thanos ja tu przyszedłem coś ciekawego poczytać, no ale jednak się przejechałem na tym serwisie, widzę że zgłoszenie odrzucone. Serio wrzucanie walki lewica/prawica nie jest treścią polityczną?
@Sol_Ziemi, i tak, jestem za aborcją. Jak dziecko ma umrzeć chwilę po porodzie, ma być chore lub jest efektem gwałtu każdy powinien mieć do tego prawo.
@Thimovsky, dla organizmu kobiety zdrowsze jest urodzić dziecko, które umrze niż przechodzenie łyżeczkowania i rozchwianie hormonalne w wyniku przerywanej ciąży.
@wiktor, tak, a potem mam rozumieć zaadoptujesz takie dziecko i ułożysz pod nie swoje życie? Takie warzywo lepiej przecież urodzić niż dokonać aborcji. Tak samo lepiej urodzić dziecko z gwałtu. Przecież nienawiść do dziecka, od początku problemy psychiczne przez gwałt (aż do końca życia, dziecko codziennie ci to będzie przypominało) to nic w porównaniu do rozchwiania hormonalnego po przerwanej ciąży.
Ukochany
-1
Abortions increase the overall quality of life. Fetuses that are aborted are usually getting aborted by parents who are not in a good position to raise a child or aren't ready. By forcing them to keep the child, it is possible that they will resent the child for having fucked up their life, leading to poor parenting and a fucked up child. If you allow them to abort, you let them get their lives together before raising a child, bettering their quality of life as well as their child's. They will also be more likely to give good parenting because they will be in a better state of mind (and likely older and therefore more experienced). There is no societal advantage to preventing abortions. Unwanted kids are more likely to turn out bad. Abortions effectively reduce crime in the long run.
For the argument of "it's a human being". Until a certain point, no it isn't. If it cannot survive without its host (the mother), then it is not an independant living creature, which means it cannot be a human being. Until the fetus can live on its own, detached from the mother, it is closer to being an organ or parasite than it is to being a human being. It's like saying a law student is a lawyer. No they're not. They are going to be, but they currently aren't. Things progress and become new things. If you use the logic that fetuses are human beings, then you can easily stretch it out to saying that every fucking ovocyte is as well and that the mother kills a child every period.
As for the argument of morality, abortions are more moral in the long run as they effectively help increase the average quality of the citizens, by allowing parents who aren't settled into their lives to settle into their lives before getting a child. The child is statistically more likely to be successful, less likely to be delinquent. The child is also less likely to be born into a broken home, reducing his chances of long term mental issues.
wiktor
0
Cyr4x
-1
Thimovsky
0
Konto usunięteWpis został usunięty przez autora
Thimovsky
1
@Thanos ja tu przyszedłem coś ciekawego poczytać, no ale jednak się przejechałem na tym serwisie, widzę że zgłoszenie odrzucone. Serio wrzucanie walki lewica/prawica nie jest treścią polityczną?
Thanos
0
Thimovsky
0
Thimovsky
1
wiktor
-1
Thimovsky
0
wiktor
0